3 F. Supp. 2d 45 - Maxwell v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7852 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 6 U.S.C. § 552A
Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala · United States v. Mersey · England v. Commissioner · 669 F. Supp. 317 - O'Connor v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the provision of the Privacy Act providing the federal district courts with jurisdiction over civil actions to enforce the Privacy Act 'shall not be applied' to the IRS.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lake v. Rubin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.