3 Haw. App. 30 - Windward Partners v. Lopes’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2011
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 1 Haw. App. 379 - Giuliani v. Chuck · Malani v. Clapp · 2 Haw. App. 86 - Ottensmeyer v. Baskin · 2 Haw. App. 176 - Lane v. Yamamoto · Ikeoka v. Kong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under H.R.C.P., Rule 56(c) a summary judgment will be sustained only if the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [Citations omitted.] Inferences to be drawn from the record must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.