3 Haw. App. 396 - State v. Okubo’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2016
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Eisenstadt v. Baird · United States v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“SEARCHES , SEIZURES AND INVASION OF PRIVACY Section 7. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches, seizures and invasions of privacy shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized or the communications sought to be intercepted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lee · State v. Okubo“(1) A participant-police officer wore a “Nagra” brand body tape recorder which recorded face-to-face conversations; (2) A participant-police officer permitted telephone conversations to be recorded with an audio recorder attached to the phone which the officer was using; (3) A participant-police officer wore a transmitter, which simultaneously broadcasted face-to-face conversations to other police officers who monitored and recorded the conversations, sometimes in conjunction with videotape recordings and sometimes not; and (4) The monitoring police officers video-tape recorded the face-to-face conversations among Officers Nagao and Higa and the defendants. See 3 Haw. App. at 398; 651 P.2d at 497-98 (1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Okubo“§ 641 -13 By State in criminal cases. An appeal maybe taken byandonbehalfof the State from the district or circuit courts to the supreme court, subject to chapter 602, in all criminal cases, in the following instances: * * * (7) From a pre-trial order granting a motion for the suppression of evidence, including a confession or admission, or the return of property in which case the intermediate appellate court or the supreme court, as the case may be, shall give priority to such an appeal and the order shall be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.