3 H. & J. 70
Decided June 15, 1810
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1810-06-15
This was a special action on the case, the declaration stating that a suit had been brought in the late general court against the appellee, to recover land of which the appellant was in possession, and that the appellant agreed to indemnify him if he would defend the suit, &c. The general issue was pleaded/ and at the trial the plaintiff, (the now appellee,) offered in evidence a record duly certi&ed, &c. of the proceedings in the suit above referred to, being an action of…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1911
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1810-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1delivered the opinion of the court. The court are of opinion, that the plot is a part of the records, and that a copy of it ought to have been annexed to the *71transcript. Ami part of the record only- being produced, was not sufficient evidence to support the action in this s’ase,
¶2JUDGMENT REVERSED, AM) PROCEDENDO AWARDED.