¶1delivered the opinion of the Court:
¶2Wright brought an action of trespass against Nye. The defendant below demurred to the declaration, and the plaintiff below joined in demurrer.
¶3The record, after containing several orders, states, “ This day again came the parties, by their attorneys, and issue being joined, put themselves upon the country for trial; and thereupon came a jury,” &c., who found a verdict for the plaintiff below, and judgment was rendered thereon.
¶4It does not appear, from the record, that the demurrer filed in the cause, was disposed of or decided, unless the entry on the record, as above stated, waived the demurrer. The practice is well settled, that the defendant, by filing a plea to the declaration, waives an antecedent demurrer ; but as the record shows a demurrer filed, it ought to appear distinctly from the record, that the defendant had consented to waive the demurrer, and had filed a plea.
¶5In case a plea is relied on as a waiver, the plea should be set out in the record.
¶6The mere allegation in the record, that issue was joined, is not sufficient. The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the Court below, to decide the demurrer, or in the event a plea has been filed in the cause by which the demurrer has been waived, that a venire de novo issue.
¶7Judgment reversed.
¶8Note. See Lincoln et al. v. Cook, Ante 61.