Harris v. Jenks

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court: (1)

¶2This was a suit brought before a justice of the peace in and for Warren county, by Benjamin C. Jenks against John Harris, for $96,88.

¶3When the cause came on for trial before the justice of the peace, it was dismissed because the words “ the State of Illinois ” were not inserted in the caption of the summons. It was then appealed to the Circuit Court of Warren county. On motion, it was there ordered by the Court, that the plaintiff, Jenks, have leave to amend the summons by inserting the words, “the State of Illinois.”

¶4On the trial, the plaintiff proved his account. He also proved by Walter Butler, that the witness loaned Jenks ten dollars on account of Harris, and that Harris banded the witness $ 13, at St. Louis, for Jenks, and Jenks got goods at St. Louis, on account of Harris. Witness knew of no settlement between the parties, nor did he know that the money and goods were to be applied on plaintiff’s account, but understood they were. The defendant moved the Court to instruct the jury, as in case of nonsuit. The motion was overruled, and verdict and judgment were then rendered in favor of the plaintiff, against the defendant, for $96,88. To reverse the judgment this appeal is brought.

¶5For aught that appears, the words “the State of Illinois,” might have appeared on some other part of the summons. It does not necessarily follow that the process did not run in the proper name. It is immaterial in what part of the summons the words, “ the State of Illinois ” appear ; and by the 35th section of “ An Act concerning Justices of the Peace and Constables,’’ (2) it is provided, that the Circuit Court shall at any time admit of such amendment of the papers and proceedings as may be necessary to a fair trial of the case upon its merits. Under this statute it would seem that the Court had a right to order the amendment.

¶6We see no objection to the jurisdiction of the justice, on account of the amount in controversy. In the case of Hugunin v. Nicholson, (1) it was decided, that a justice of the peace has jurisdiction in a case where the original indebtedness exceeds one hundred dollars, but has been reduced below that sum by fair credits. It is not necessary that the accounts between the parties should be liquidated. The act of March 2, 1833, provides for a case like the present.

¶7The judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren county is affirmed, with costs.

¶8Judgment affirmed.

¶9Note. See State Bank v. Buckmaster, Breese 133.