Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ill. 2d 318 - Simmon v. Iowa Mutual Casualty Co.

3 Ill. 2d 318 - Simmon v. Iowa Mutual Casualty Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
9
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 223 So. 2d 713 - Shingleton v. Bussey (1969), 222 Ill. 2d 303 - Country Mutual Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine (2006)

12 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

28019541960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Higgins v. Midland Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““‘Automobile insurance has taken an important position in the modem world. It is no longer a private contract merely between two parties. The greater part of litigation in our trial courts is concerned with claims arising out of property damage, personal injury or death caused by operation of motor vehicles. * * * Government and the general public have an understandable interest in the problem. Many persons injured and disabled from automobile accidents would become public charges were it not for financial assistance received from the insurance companies.’””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not a condition which will dispense with the requirement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Conceding that the insurance company is entitled to reasonable notice to protect its interests, where such notice is given by a person other than the assured, is the company then without liability in the event the injured party is entitled to recovery? We do not feel that such a harsh result should follow, nor that it was intended by the contracting parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.