Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ill. App. 3d 829 - People v. Wright

3 Ill. App. 3d 829 - People v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently September 1993 · most notably 24 Ill. App. 3d 489 - People v. Barksdale (1974), 57 Ill. App. 3d 134 - People v. Thompson (1978)

47 state decisions

330197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 10 Ill. 2d 430 - The People v. Davis · 28 Ill. 2d 566 - The PEOPLE v. Jackson · 29 Ill. 2d 375 - The PEOPLE v. Brown · 18 Ill. 2d 439 - The PEOPLE v. Thomas · 38 Ill. 2d 23 - The PEOPLE v. Boney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Clear and convincing evidence, however, is not synonymous with uncontradicted or unimpeached testimony. Minor variances in the testimony may occur and, if so, these variances constitute mere discrepancies going only to credibility. (People v. Jackson (1963), 28 Ill.2d 566 .) It is the task oí the trier of fact, here the court, to weigh these discrepancies in light of all the other testimony in reaching its decision. If it is found that the discrepancies are so minor as not to detract from the reasonableness of her story as a whole, the testimony of the prosecutrix may be found to be clear and convincing. [Citations.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.