Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 JOHNS 229 - Tillotson v. Preston

Tillotson v. Preston’s Empirical Analysis

1808

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 1926
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1926

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

801808181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The demurrer is not well taken. If the plaintiff has accepted the principal, he cannot afterwards bring an action for the interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.