¶1without giving any opinion on the suggestions of the counsel, thought the bill contained ground for an injunction, and referred to what he had said in the case of M’Kay v. Green.
¶2Injunction granted. •
¶3Ante, p. 56.
3 Johns. Ch. 349
Depau v. Moses
Decided May 11, 1818
New York Court of Chancery · decided 1818-05-11
BILL stating that the plaintiff sues as well on behalf of himself, as of the other creditors of Isaac Moses deceased, who shall come in and contribute to the expenses of the suit; and that Isaac Moses, together with Moses L. Moses and David Moses, two of his sons, traded under the firm of Isaac Moses Sons, and became indebted to the plaintiff and others, in divers sums of money; to the plaintiff in 4,650 dollars, by a promissory note to him, and payable on the 15th of April,…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1829
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1818-05-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →