Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Johns. Ch. 363

Smith v. West

New York Court of Chancery

Decided June 9, 1818

New York Court of Chancery · decided 1818-06-09

<p>THIS cause was set down for hearing, in September last, by the plaintiff, on bill and answer, but he did not bring it on. The defendant, accordingly, in May last, entered an order, and gave notice that he be at liberty to bring the cause to a hearing, at this time ; upon receiving the notice, the plaintiff filed a replication, and put the cause at issue.</p>

Decided 1818-06-09

The Chancellor.

¶1Under the circumstances of this case, the motion cannot be granted. There are, no doubt, frequent instances in which the court has allowed the plaintiff to reply, after the cause had been set down for hearing, on bill and answer. It is a matter resting in discretion. In some cases the plaintiff has been permitted to reply, after having gone to a hearing, on payment of costs. (Wyatt’s P. R. 375. Donegall v. Warr, 1 Eq. Cas. Abr. 43 pl. 4.) I shall, therefore, deny the motion, on condition that the plaintiff, within four days, pay the defendant’s costs arising from the cause being set down for *364hearing in September last, and from the proceedings on thepart of the defendant, in May- last. No costs of the present motion to be allowed on either side.

¶2Order accordingly-

/3/johnsch/363 · .json · Public domain