Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 KAN 123 - Cusic v. Douglas

Cusic v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis

1865

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
6
states following
March 1969
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1969

11 state decisions

3018651870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• “That no inconvenience may arise from the change from a territorial government to a permanent state government, it is declared by this Constitution that all suits, rights, actions, prosecutions, recognizances, contracts, judgments, and claims, both as respects individuals and bodies corporate, shall continue as if no change^ had taken place.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “so long as the extent of the homestead shall be in accordance with sound policy and humanity, and no greater than shall be reasonably necessary to protect the citizens in their pursuits necessary to their existence and well being.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.