Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 KAN 374 - Swartzel v. Rogers

Swartzel v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1865

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
6
states following
January 1958
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1958

11 state decisions

501865187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that the contestants are Shawnee Indians, did not deprive the district court nor does it forbid to this court the exercise of jurisdiction either as to parties or subject matter. That the property belongs to Indians is not sufficient to place it beyond the jurisdiction of the state courts; and if the subject matter be within their jurisdiction, the parties whether Indians or white men, have the right to litigate about it therein.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.