Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Kan. App. 2d 347 - Dunn v. Dunn

3 Kan. App. 2d 347 - Dunn v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2010

10 state decisions

8019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lopez v. Lopez · Moran v. Moran · St. Clair v. St. Clair · Brooker v. Brooker · Baker v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A decree in an action under this article may include orders on the following matters: (g) Costs and fees. Costs and attorneys’ fees may be awarded to either par- . ty as justice and equity may require.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Pursuant to this statute [K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-1610(h) (now K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 60-1610[b][4]), the district court is vested with wide discretion to determine both the amount and the recipient of an allowance of attorney fees. [Citation omitted.] Upon review of an award of attorney fees, the appellate court does not reweigh the testimony or evidence presented nor reassess the credibility of witnesses. [Citation omitted.] The trial judge is considered an expert in determining attorney fees [citation omitted]; and an attorney fee award will not be set aside on appeal when supported by substantial competent evidence.’ [Citation omitted.]” (Emphasis added.) Powell v. Powell, 231 Kan. at 463 (quoting Dunn, 3 Kan. App. 2d at 348 ).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.