Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Kan. App. 2d 456 - Baum v. Greyhound Corp.

3 Kan. App. 2d 456 - Baum v. Greyhound Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is noted that the legislature has used the word ‘may’ in this statute. To us this means that the matter of awarding attorney fees is at the discretion of the district court. We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in denying these attorney fees.” 3 Kan. App. 2d at 458 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.