Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Kan. App. 2d 59 - State v. Guhl

3 Kan. App. 2d 59 - State v. Guhl’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. United States · In Re Estate of Bernatzki · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Berkowitz · State v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to bring hearsay evidence within the business records exception of K.S.A. 60-460(m), a witness who can identify the report and explain methods and procedures used in its production must testify, establishing that the records were made in the regular course of a business at or about the time of the act, condition or event recorded, and that the sources of information from which the records were made and the method of preparation indicate their trustworthiness.” [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.