¶1The law regulating the proceedings on attachment, does not authorise the levying the attachment awarded in this case on land.
¶2Judgment reversed.
¶3 A fimil-ir decifion was given, fpring term, 1808, in the cafe of Anderfon vs. Morton, and Co.
3 Ky. 5
Murray v. Hamilton
Decided April 16, 1805
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · decided 1805-04-16
HAMILTON issued his capias against Murray, and on a return “ a copy left,” took out an attachment, which was levied on a lot in South Frankfort ; on that return Hamilton proceeded and obtained judgment in the court below.
Decided 1805-04-16