Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 L. Ed. 342

11 U.S. 278

7 Cranch 278

Wallen v. Williams

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 13, 1812.

Relies on Wallen v. Williams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1812-03-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2002 · most notably Donovan v. City of Dallas (1964), Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc. (1973)

5 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

13018121820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Present ... . All the Judges.

¶2JONES, for the Plaintiff in error.

¶3P.B. KEY, contra.

¶4*279 TODD, J.

¶5The attachment to compel a performance of the decree was unavailing; and upon the return of it, the habere facias was issued in conformity with the practice in that state, as admitted by the counsel on both sides in the Court below. It was ordered as a matter of course, and no objection was made. If this motion should prevail, it will make the writ of error operate as a supersedeas, contrary to the intention of the act of Congress.

¶6Motion overruled.

/3/led/342 · .json · Public domain