Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Mass. Supp. 771

Whitby v. Denno

Massachusetts District Court

Decided July 27, 1982

Massachusetts District Court · decided 1982-07-27

Relies on 1 Mass. App. Ct. 846 - Griffin v. Powers · Healy v. Board of Appeals of Watertown · 32 Mass. App. Dec. 86 - Brandywine v. Kardon

Decided 1982-07-27

¶1DECISION AND ORDER

¶2This cause came on to and was heard in the Appellate Division for the Western District sitting at Springfield upon Report from the Northampton Division, and no error having been found,

¶3It is hereby

¶4ORDERED: That the Clerk of the Northampton Division make the following entry in said case on the docket of said Court, namely: Report dismissed.

Mel L. Greenberg, JusticeBernard Lenhoff, JusticeWilliam T. Walsh, Justice

¶5Opinion filed herewith.

Robert E. Fein, Clerk

¶6OPINION

Greenberg, J.

¶7This action was transferred to the District Court of Hampshire from the Superior Court pursuant to G.L. Ch. 231, section 102C. On June 18, 1981 a judgment was entered against the defendant. Notice of the judgment was received by defendant’s counsel on June 22, 1981. A timely request for retransfer should have been filed with the District Court by J uly 2, 1981. In fact, the request was mailed and received by the Court on July 7, 1981, five days beyond the requisite 10-day period.

¶8A motion for leave to file the request late, treated by the trial judge as a motion for transfer, was denied. The defendant claims to be aggrieved by this action of the trial judge.

¶9The statute in question is clear and unambiguous in its terms that “(t)he request for retransfer . '. . shall be filed with the clerk of said district court within ten days after , notice of the finding or decision.” The language has been held as mandatory and not directory in numerous cases. Brandywine v. Kardon, 32 Mass. App. Dec. 86 (1965); Griffin v. Powers, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 846 (1973). Only the filing of a motion pursuant to Dist./Mun. Ct. R. Civ. P. 59 to amend judgment or an appeal taken pursuant to G.L. ch. 231, sec, 108 within the ten-day period stays the ultimate axe from its fall on the aggrieved party. Davis, et al v. Bennett, Mass. App. Dec. (1982) a/; Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, 356 Mass. 131 (1974).

¶10*773Accordingly, the trial judge’s denial of • the retransfer .was proper. There being ho other error, this report is hereby dismissed.

MelL. Greenberg, J.Bernard Lenhoff, I.William T. Walsh, P.J.

¶11This certifies that this is the OPINION of the Appellate Division in this cause.

Robert E. Fein, Clerk

¶12a/ 1982 Mass. Ápp. Div. 41

/3/masssupp/771 · .json · Public domain