Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Md. 131

Webster v. Hammond & Stevenson

General Court of Virginia

Decided May 15, 1793

General Court of Virginia · decided 1793-05-15

IN this case a suit was brought in the county court of Baltimore by the appellant, upon a single bill, dated the 2d of August, 1783, for 141/. 15s. current money, which bill was endorsed ; that the testator, on the 4th October, 1784, paid 94/. Os. 6d. current money, and also a payment made 29th January, 1785, of 21/. 11s. current money. The writ issued on the 3d of February, 1791.

Decided 1793-05-15

¶1The plaintiff appealed to the general court, and

Chase, Ch. J.

¶2delivered the following opinion of the court:

¶3Before I consider the question I would make a few general remarks.

¶4Every executor or administrator is obliged by his duty, oath and law, to administer the goods and chattels of the testator or intestate, which come to his hands, according to law.

¶5The law, before the act of 1785, c. 80. established the order in which debts due from the testator or intestate to private persons, should be paid.

¶61. Debts of record (and decrees in chancery, 2 Vern. 89.) of which the executor or administrator was obliged to take notice at his peril; for if he paid previously any other debts, he thereby became guilty of a devastavit, *134and liable to pay such debts of record and decrees de bonis propriis. The person who first sueth execution' must be first preferred. Before execution, the executor or administrator may prefer which he pleases. If two or more issued scire facias, the executor or administrator may confess assets to which of them he pleases, and plead generally plene administramt to the other scire facias. Swinb. 402.

¶72. Debts by specialty, or for rent, or on foreign bills of exchange, or inland bills or negotiable notes, &c. since 1766, of which the creditor ought to give timely notice to the executor or administrator. By timely notice, I understand information before he has given judgments in actions of debts of an inferior nature. An executor or administrator may prefer any of these creditors he pleases, in the same manner as creditors of record.

¶83. Debts on simple contract, of which the creditor ought to give notice. 1 Went. 133. 2 Went. 73. 110. Law of Test. 430. Godolph. 215—225. 1 Com. Dig. 245. 2 Bl. Com. 511. Swinb.

¶9From this legal order of paying debts the executor or administrator cannot depart. If he pays a debt on simple contract, after notice of a debt by specialty or decree, or on bills of exchange made in certain cases, equal to specialties by act of assembly, or for rent, and there should be a deficiency of assets, he is answerable to the amount of such improper and illegal payment out of his own proper goods. Bull. 141. 178. Fitzg. 76.

¶10The law gives an executor or administrator certain privileges which he cannot be deprived of even in equity, unless by fraud. He may pay or retain in his hands to pay his own debts, in preference and prejudice of debts of equal degree. 10 Mod. 496. 11 Vin. Abr. 296.

¶11If debts are of the same degree, (and the time of payment arrived,) the executor or administrator may pay which he pleases first, unless action is commenced, and in this case he may give a preference by confessing assets, *135in any subsequent suit, and he may plead such judgment to the action first commenced, and he may delay the first suit for this purpose. Swinb. 459. 1 Lev. 200. 10 Mod. 496. 1 P. Wms. 295, 5 Com. Dig. 203. 11 Vin. Abr. tit. Executors, 270. Swinb. 398.

¶12If an action is brought against executor or administrator, and he has paid debts of a superior degree, or such debts are outstanding and unsatisfied, he must plaed such debts iu bar of the action, and cannot give it in evidence on plene administravit. 3 Lev. 114.

¶13Commencement of suit (which may be immediately on death of testator, 2 Atk. 301.) will sometimes entitle to a priority of payment, (2. e. restrain the election of executor or administrator,) as in the case of debts of equal degree, and action is brought by one of the creditors, the executor or administrator cannot pay the debt on which suit is not brought, but he is bound to discharge the debt in suit. Law of Test. 427. Cro. Eliz. 41. Swinb. 458.

¶14The court of Baltimore county was of opinion, that an executor is justified in paying simple contract debts after notice of a debt by specialty, unless such notice was by-action commenced. Cases cited, 1 Mod. 174, 175. So argued Chappel, in Fitzg. 77. and Lev. 113. 3 Mod. 115. Comb. 35. 2 Show. 492. Vaughan, 89. Esp. 293. 2 Bl. Com. 512. Dyer, 32. a. 2 Lev. 60. Special Pleader, 279. 2 Bac. Abr. 435. 1 Durn. & East, 690.

¶15The opinion, therefore, of the court below is erroneous, because contrary to law, uniform practice, and greatly detrimental to administration of estates.

¶16Notice may be in writing, or verbal. Went. 145. Law of Test. 428. Vaugh. 94. S. C. 11 Vin. Abr. tit. Executors, 296, pl. 8. Andr. 340. Fitzg. 76, 1 Barnad. B. R. 186. 2 Cro. 535. 1 Com. Dig. 245. 1 Durn. & East, 690.

Hollingsworth, for the appellant.D. M'Mechen, for the appellees.

¶17The plea is always plene administravit before notice. Clk. Asst. 167. 2 Bro. 100.

¶18If notice by suit, the plea must be plene administravit before writ issued.

¶19Such decision would compel all specialty creditors t<j sue.

¶20Let the judgment be reversed.

¶21Procedendo awarded to the county court.

/3/md/131 · .json · Public domain