3 Md. App. 231 - Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 1985
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schowgurow v. State · Basoff v. State · Judy v. State · 3 Md. App. 11 - Boone v. State · 2 Md. App. 52 - Barton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * the substance of the report was not relevant to the issues in the case since, at most, it established that Ketcham’s description of the men who entered the victim’s home was different than that given by the victim of her assailants and, additionally, different from that of the appellant. We note that Ketcham’s description of the men, as related in the police report, was most general and actually was consistent with the victim’s description of the clothing worn by the two men. In any event, we see no error in the court’s refusal to admit the police report into evidence.” 3 Md. App. 231, 236 , 238 A. 2d 569, 572 (1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Austin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.