Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Md. App. 666 - Robinson v. State

3 Md. App. 666 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 1986 · most notably 12 Md. App. 684 - Walker v. State (1971), 5 Md. App. 222 - Barnhart v. State (1968)

2 district · 35 state decisions

170196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Malloy v. Hogan · United States v. Bayer · Clewis v. Texas · Beecher v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that in order for a confession to be admissible into evidence against an accused, the State must prove that it was voluntary and not the product of force, threats, promises or inducements. Abbott v. State, 231 Md. 462 ; Cooper v. State, 1 Md. App. 190 . Otherwise stated, to be voluntary, a statement cannot be ‘extracted by any sort of threats or violence, nor obtained by any direct or implied promises, however slight, nor by the exertion of any improper influence.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.