Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 MICH 163 - Johnson v. Wing

Johnson v. Wing’s Empirical Analysis

1854

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
May 1917
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1917

5 state decisions

201854186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rust v. Low · Bush v. Brainard · Studwell v. Ritch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the remedy given by chapter 125 is a special proceeding adapted to this case of distress of property, and that it expressly negatives a remedy by replevin in any other manner than is therein provided. We are therefore of the opinion that the plaintiff has not pursued the remedy prescribed by the law which governs in such cases, and that he cannot recover in this action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.