Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Mich. App. 9 - Williams v. Benson

3 Mich. App. 9 - Williams v. Benson’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
9
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Layman v. Binns (1988), Badon v. General Motors Corp. (1982)

5 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

90196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is much authority to the effect that if one party to a contract or transaction has superior knowledge or knowledge which is not within the fair and reasonable reach of the other party and which he could not discover by the exercise of reasonable diligence, or means of knowledge which are not open to both parties alike, he is under a legal obligation to speak, and his silence constitutes fraud....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.