Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 MJ 60 - United States v. Lanzer

United States v. Lanzer’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
April 2013
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. King (1977), United States v. Dawson (1981)

13019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 845 · 10 U.S.C. § 907

Relies on Santobello v. New York · United States v. Green · United States v. Holland · United States v. Elmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that pretrial agreements will be strictly enforce based upon the express wording of the agreement, and where the intention of the parties at the time of the agreement is clear, the agreement must be upheld, (citations omitted). United States v. Lanzer, 3 M.J. 60, 62 (C.M.A.1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.