Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 MONT 480 - Story v. Maclay

Story v. Maclay’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1963
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilder v. City of Saint Paul · Bearce v. Jackson · Jackson ex dem. Eyck v. Frost · Gates v. Kieff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The record does not show that the witness was competent to give his opinion as an expert. There was no preliminary examination to ascertain whether he was qualified to express an opinion upon the subject of the inquiry. It does not appear that he had any knowledge whatever of the freighting business, or of the rates usually charged per pound for transporting merchandise. It was not shown that he knew any facts or had any knowledge that would qualify him to speak as an expert. His opinion was therefore incompetent testimony upon a material issue and its admission in evidence error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.