Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 N.C. App. 230

State v. Sutton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1968

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1968-12-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1969

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BROCK, J.

¶1Defendant’s only assignment of error is to the entry of the judgment..This assignment of error presents the record proper for review. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152. We note that the pleas of guilty tendered by the defendant were accepted only after Judge Jackson had carefully examined the defendant and advised him of the possible consequences of his pleas. The sentence imposed was within statutory limits. G.S. 14-335.

¶2With appropriate candor, defendant’s court-appointed counsel has stated that his review of the record of the proceedings discloses no prejudicial error. We agree with counsel’s appraisal.

¶3No error.

Britt and Parker, JJ., concur.
/3/ncapp/230 · .json · Public domain