Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 NCAPP 323 - State v. Beasley

State v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2013

7 state decisions

40196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bruton · State v. Bass · State v. Keller · State v. . Malpass · State v. . Crawford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The accused must act with malice aforethought. (2) The act must be done on purpose and unlawfully. (3) The act must be done with intent to maim or disfigure a privy member of the person assaulted. (4) There must be permanent injury to the privy member of the person assaulted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.