Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 NEV 194 - Knickerbocker v. Hall

Knickerbocker v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1867

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1927
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1927

4 state decisions

201867187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carson River Lumbering Co. v. Bassett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Because, under our practice, the pleadings are to be liberally construed, with a view to substantial justice between the parties, it does not follow that the substantial rules of pleading can be disregarded and that every hotch-potch of inconsistent facts indorsed ‘complaint,’ or ‘answer,’ is to be deemed a sufficient pleading.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.