3 N.J. Eq. 266
Decided January 15, 1843
New Jersey Court of Chancery · decided 1843-01-15
The complainant in this canse filed his bill, for forclosure- and sale of mortgaged premises, against the mortgagor and others having subsequent incumbrances.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1843-01-15
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1962
1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The case is within the principle of the authorities cited. The sale must be set aside, and a re-sale made, upon the payment, by the petitioner, of the expenses of the first sale, and the costs of this motion
¶2Cited in Marlatt v. Warwick, 3 C. E. Gr. 123; Kloepping v. Stillmacher, 6 C. E. Gr. 330; Nat. Bk. of Metropolis v. Sprague, Id. 461: Wetzler v. Schawman, 9 C. E. Gr. 64.