Taub v. Pirnie’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably 2 Ohio App. 3d 204 - Lies v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Board (1981), Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission (1961)
8 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. United States · Weekes v. O'Connell · Matter of Kilgus v. Bd. of Estimate of City of Ny · Columbia Cheese Co. v. McNutt · National Labor Relations Board v. Jasper Chair Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In ascertaining whether an informed decision has been made, the courts accord the decision the presumption of regularity to which it is entitled * * * and refrain from probing the mental processes of the * * * (deciding officer) in reaching his conclusions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the extent to which independent study of the evidence in the record is necessary to the required exercise of informed judgment must be left to the wisdom and practical good sense of the commissioners themselves”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Yaretsky v. Blum“[I]n the absence of a `clear' revelation that the administrative body `made no independent appraisal and reached no independent conclusion', its decision will not be disturbed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.