Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ohio App. 3d 108 - State v. Bissantz

3 Ohio App. 3d 108 - State v. Bissantz’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2019

22 state decisions

1001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Hoffa v. United States · Thornhill v. Alabama · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.