Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ohio App. 3d 139 - Baugh v. Carver

3 Ohio App. 3d 139 - Baugh v. Carver’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably 85 Ohio App. 3d 179 - Park v. Ambrose (1993), In re Adoption of Sunderhaus (1992)

33 state decisions

13019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gomez v. Perez · Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland · Johnson v. Norman · State v. Buckley · Franklin v. Julian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the awarding of a monetary amount for child support is a matter generally within the discretion of the trial court, this does not permit it to ignore the fact that, under R.C. 3111.17, the child is entitled to, and the father is obligated to provide, support from the date of birth. Where damages for support payments for the period from the date of the child’s birth to the date of adjudication are prayed for and proved, as here, it is an abuse of discretion for the court to make no award of child support for that period in the absence of an affirmative demonstration of some circumstance which ought reasonably to relieve the father of this obligation and the child of this entitlement.” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 140-141 , 3 OBR at 158-159, 444 N.E.2d at 61 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.