3 Ohio App. 3d 197 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably 111 Ohio App. 3d 142 - State v. Medcalf (1996), 126 Ohio App. 3d 95 - State v. Lloyd (1998)
3 federal appellate · 77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For better or worse, the law prohibits drunken driving, not driving after a drink.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The act of only nominally exceeding the speed limit coupled with the arresting officers’ perception of the odor of alcohol (not characterized as pervasive or strong), and nothing more, does not furnish probable cause to arrest an individual for driving under the influence of alcohol.” (Emphasis sic.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the existence of some reasonable indicia of operation while under the influence of alcohol ***.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Simmons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.