Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ohio App. 3d 210 - Thrasher v. Thrasher

3 Ohio App. 3d 210 - Thrasher v. Thrasher’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably 86 Ohio App. 3d 327 - In Re Pryor (1993), 79 Ohio App. 3d 194 - Roach v. Roach (1992)

33 state decisions

19019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meyer v. State of Nebraska · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · 52 Ohio St. 2d 89 - Perales v. Nino · Boyer v. Boyer · Baxter v. Baxter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is evident that there may be disputes between parents and non-parents under either R.C. 3109.04 or 2151.23, and it would be inconsistent and unwise to have two distinct substantive law tests, one for each statute. * * * Thus, by re-introducing the suitability test [in Perales ] the court in effect modified Boyer, supra, and its construction of R.C. 3109.04.” Thrasher, supra, 3 Ohio App.3d at 213 , 3 OBR at 243, 444 N.E.2d at 434 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If the court finds, with respect to any child under eighteen years of age, that it is in the best interest of the child for neither parent to be designated the residential parent and legal custodian of the child, it may commit the child to a relative of the child * * *.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In a child custody dispute between the parent of a child and a non-parent brought under R.C. 3109.04 , a suitable parent has a paramount right to custody so long as such custody is not detrimental to the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.