3 Ohio App. 3d 341 - State v. Lampkin’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * the court shall hold a hearing to determine if the offender is eligible for conditional probation. The offender is eligible for probation if the court finds that: “(1) The offender is drug dependent or is in danger of becoming drug dependent, and he may benefit from rehabilitation or treatment; '“(2) The offender has been accepted into an appropriate drug treatment facility or program for rehabilitation or treatment. * * * “(3) The offender has committed an offense for which probation may be granted in accordance with section 2951.02 of the Revised Code. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.