3 Ohio App. 3d 441 - State v. Rainey’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 117 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion) (2016), State v. Fitzpatrick (2004)
2 federal appellate · 117 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order for a trial court to determine that a defendant is making a plea with an understanding of the nature of the charge to which he is entering a plea * * * the totality of the circumstances [must be] such that the trial court is warranted in making a determination that the defendant understands the charge.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“(Emphasis added.) (Aug. 30, 2018 No. 19AP-795 7 Tr. at 2.) He also stated that he understood the plea agreement, which specifically identified the charge of inducing panic. Appellant asserted that defense counsel explained the information contained in the plea form and that he understood that information. Appellant further indicated that he understood the nature of the charge of inducing panic to which he was pleading guilty. Appellant acknowledges his understanding in his appellate brief:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor“[w]here the charge to which a defendant pleads guilty is a lesser included *Page 8 offense of the crime with which he was originally charged, so that the elements of the two crimes are similar, it is not difficult to find circumstances from which the defendant could have drawn his understanding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.