Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 OHIOST2D 125 - State v. Corkran

State v. Corkran’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2006

15 state decisions

7019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 133 Ohio St. 154 - State v. Fox · 112 Ohio St. 214 - State v. Yeoman · State v. Cala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he very description in the indictment and in the evidence of the stolen merchandise . . . demonstrates that it possessed some value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.