Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Or. 469

Fassman v. Baumgartner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1869-09-15

At tbe November term, 1869, of the circuit court for Benton county, the defendants, appellants here, withdrew their answers, and judgmemt [decree] was rendered upon the complaint as upon failure to answer. The defendants afterwards gave notice of an appeal, and filed the usual boud, but failed to file a transcript in the supreme court by the second day of this term.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1869-09-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1931

7 state decisions

3018691870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Prim, O. J.

¶1Section 526 of the Code declares that any party to a judgment or decree, other than a judgment or decree given by confession, jot for want of answer, may appeal tberefrom.”

¶2“When a case is here upon a proper appeal, this court may take any action thereon authorized by statute. But tbis motion develops facts showing that tbis wras an attempted appeal in a case in which the law admits of no appeal. The parties below were present in that court, and the defendants substantially failed to answer, and the decree was given for tbat reason.

¶3*470There could be no appeal. This court could acquire no jurisdiction of the case, other than to dismiss the attempted appeal.

¶4The plaintiff below might have treated the appeal as a nullity, and procured an e; ecution at any time.

¶5Motion is denied.

/3/or/469 · .json · Public domain