Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Or. App. 241

471 P.2d 830

State v. Naughten

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 9, 1970

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1970-07-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1972

2 federal appellate ·

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Every witness is presumed to speak the truth. This presumption may be overcome by the manner in which the witness testifies, by the nature of his or her testimony, by evidence affecting his or her character, interest, or motives, by contradictory evidence, or by a presumption.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Naughten v. Cupp

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1970-07-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PEE CUEIAM.

¶1 Defendant was tried and convicted upon jury trial of the crime of assault and robbery being armed with a dangerous weapon. He did not take the witness stand.

¶2 His sole ground of appeal is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury:

“Every witness is presumed to speak the truth. This presumption may be overcome by the manner in which the witness testifies, by the nature of his or her testimony, by evidence affecting his or her character, interest, or motives, by contradictory evidence, or by a presumption.”

¶3 This instruction is not erroneous. State v. Kessler, 254 Or 124, 458 P2d 432 (1969); State v. Blank, 1 Or App 550, 464 P2d 836 (1970).

¶4 Affirmed.

/3/orapp/241 · .json · Public domain