Flanigan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Johnson v. Zerbst · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · United States v. Hayman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No court or judge, on the return of a writ of habeas corpus, may inquire into the legality or justice of any order, judgment, or [court] process [produced as justification for the petitioner's imprisonment or detention].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Grinols v. State“A person properly imprisoned ... by virtue of a legal judgment [issued by] a competent tribunal [having] civil or criminal jurisdiction ... shall not be allowed to prosecute the writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Grinols v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.