Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 PACOMMW 520 - Gribble v. Miller

Gribble v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1997

3 state decisions

10197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skelton v. Lower Merion Township · Stollar v. Continental Can Co. · Riehl v. Miller · Lackawanna County's Appeals · Senor v. Dunbar Township School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he purpose of the Legislature in compelling such accounting was to provide a simple, speedy, and effective method for adjusting the fiscal matters of a municipality . . . [and that] the decision of this tribunal [the township auditors] is conclusive, and cannot again be inquired into either by the same tribunal at another time or by a court of law except in the manner provided by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t shall be lawful for the borough, or any taxpayer thereof, on its behalf, or any officer whose account is settled or audited, to appeal from the settlement or audit, as shown in the auditors’ report, to the court of common pleas of the county, not later than forty days from the date of filing of the auditors’ report with the clerk of the court of quarter sessions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.