Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 PIN 123 - Kellogg v. Larkin

Kellogg v. Larkin’s Empirical Analysis

1851

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2022

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

40185118601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a general rule, the immediate representatives of the people, in législature assembled, would seem to be the fairest exponents of what public policy requires, as being most familiar with the habits and fashions of the day, and with the actual condition of commerce and trade, their consequent wants and weaknesses; and a legislative enactment would seem to be the least objectionable form of exposition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.