3 Pin. 295
Decided December 15, 1851
Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 1851-12-15
Kennedy brought an action of replevin' against Baker & Haselton for certain of bis goods and chattels, and they justified the seizure and detention for that they were seized and held under process of law to satisfy a debt due from Kennedy to Baker, and that Haselton was an officer having such process to execute and duly authorized to execute it.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1915
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1851-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The removal of the goods in question to an auction store to be sold, is evidence that they were no longer to be used as ‘‘stock in trade,” and are not, therefore, protected by the exemption act.
¶2We do not deem it necessary to decide whether goods used, as in this case, are stock in trade within the meaning of that act. The judgment must be affirmed.