¶1Decree appealed from reversed with costs, and a decree directed to be entered declaring the bill of sale and the deeds from Semler to Newman fraudulent and void as against the complainant; and decreeing payment of the complainant’s debt, with interest and costs, out of the surplus proceeds of the premises, which have been paid into court; with liberty to complainant to apply for further directions, if necessary.
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 22
Whiting v. Semler
Decided April 4, 1843
New York Court of Chancery · decided 1843-04-04
Decided 1843-04-04