¶1The court were all clear, that the amendment ought to be made, for the reasons given in the case of D’Urphey v. Nelson, vide ante 233, and upon the authority of the case of Harrison’s Administrator v. Taylor’s Executor, ante, 289.
3 S.C.L. 376
Smith v. Vining's Administratrix
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 15, 1804
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1804-04-15
Motion to amend a judgment, by the insertion of the following words, via. “ lands and tenements,” after the words “ goods and chattels,” so as to subject the real estate of the defendant’s intes. tate to seizure, and sale for his debt,- which words were omitted in the judgment. 'Trezevant, J. in Marlborough district court, had refused this motion, and reserved the point for the decision of this court.
Decided 1804-04-15