¶1The facts in this case, and the only question raised, are the same as in McClurg v. Same defendant and appellant, decided at this term, and reported in 3 S. D. 362, 53 N. W. Rep. 428, and for the reasons therein stated, the order appealed from in this case is affirmed.
3 S.D. 366
Latham v. State Bindery Co.
Decided October 31, 1892
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1892-10-31
Action by Harry H. Latham & Co. against the State Bindery Company on three promissory notes. Before a trial was had, defendant made an assignment to Eoyal F. King for the benefit of its creditors. The assignee, as such, asked for an .order to be permitted to intervene, which was denied, and he appeals.
Relies on McClurg v. State Bindery Co.
Affirmed · Decided 1892-10-31