Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 SD 509 - State v. Knight

State v. Knight’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co. (1904), In re Nevitt (1902)

6 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

6018931900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Robinson · Ex parte Reed · Kearney · New Orleans v. The Steamship Company · People Ex Rel. Hackley v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If file contempt consists in the refusal of a party to do something which he is ordered to do for the benefit or advantage of the opposite party, the process is civil, and he stands committed until he complies with the order. * * * If, on the other hand, the contempt consists in the doing of a forbidden act, injurious to the opposite party, the proceeding is criminal, and conviction is followed by fine or imprisonment, or both; and this is by way of punishment. * * * This rule, as definitely stated, has not been expressly recognized by any case coming under our observation, but it is consistent with all the decisions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.