Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 SE2D 301 - Ebert v. . Disher

Ebert v. . Disher’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2005

6 state decisions

3019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Avery v. . Stewart · O'Briant v. . Lee · McCall v. Textile Industrial Institute · Luton v. Badham. · Kivett v. . McKeithan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[A] court of equity may decree specific performance, when it would be a virtual fraud to allow the defendant to interpose the statute as a defense and at the same time secure to himself the benefit of what has been done in performance.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.