Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 So. 3d 426

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-02-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Johnson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Eric L. Johnson filed in the trial court a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The trial court properly denied the petition. This is because a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be filed “in the appellate court to which the appeal was or should have been taken.” Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(2); see also Johnson v. State, 694 So.2d 159, 159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

¶2 Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), which “permits this court to treat a case as if the proper remedy has been invoked,” we treat “this appeal as a petition for writ of habeas corpus.” Johnson, 694 So.2d at 159. We find Johnson’s ineffective assistance claim legally insufficient and hereby deny the petition.

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
/3/so3d/426 · .json · Public domain